Dampak Teknologi E-Logistic SCM Terhadap Distributor Busana di Pontianak Selatan

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Sep 30, 2020
DOI https://doi.org/10.30864/eksplora.v10i1.392

Main Article Content

Irawan Wingdes
STMIK Pontianak

Abstract

Supply Chain Management menjadi salah satu perkembangan inti dari aktivitas organisasi. Dalam berbagai referensi SCM, utilisasi internet dan e-logistic melalui third party logistics mendukung upaya efisiensi supply chain, tetapi berpotensi mengancam rantai distributor. Menimbang kurangnya penelitian sebelumnya di Kalimantan Barat dan Pontianak khususnya, penelitian ini berupaya menjawab pertanyaan bagaimana dampak dari perkembangan SCM dan e-logistics secara praktik dalam rantai distributor di Pontianak Selatan. Metode kualitatif dengan pertanyaan semi terstruktur diutilitasi untuk penelitian. Penelitian mengacu pada teori Protection Motivation Theory untuk membahas dampak perkembangan SCM maupun penerimaan teknologi e-logistic. Alat analisis data menggunakan NVivo 12. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa perkembangan SCM mempengaruhi bisnis distributor dan terdapat persiapan yang unik di antara distributor dalam mengatasi dampak tersebut.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wingdes, I. (2020). Dampak Teknologi E-Logistic SCM Terhadap Distributor Busana di Pontianak Selatan. Jurnal Eksplora Informatika, 10(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.30864/eksplora.v10i1.392
Issue
Vol 10 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Eksplora Informatika
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Eksplora Informatika bersifat open access, yaitu dapat diakses secara umum tanpa dikenakan biaya. Penulis yang menerbitkan artikelnya di Jurnal Eksplora Informatika setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

  • Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan hak publikasi pertama kepada Jurnal Eksplora Informatika menggunakan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0.
  • Penulis diizinkan untuk mengarsipkan/menggunggah/meyimpan artikel mereka, misalnya dalam repositori institusional atau situs web/blog penulis, namun diharapkan agar memberikan rincian bibliografi yang menghargai publikasi di jurnal ini.
  • Jurnal Eksplora Informatika berhak untuk menyediakan artikel dalam berbagai bentuk dan media, sehingga artikel dapat digunakan untuk teknologi terbaru bahkan setelah dipublikasikan.
  • Jurnal Eksplora Informatika berhak untuk menegakkan hak-hak atas nama penulis pada artikel terhadap pihak ketiga. Misalnya dalam kasus plagiarisme atau pelanggaran hak cipta.

References

E. Monk and B. Wagner, Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning, 4th ed. New York: CENGage, 2012. [link]

S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management. Strategy, Planning & Operation, 5th ed. New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2013. [link]

W. M. Lankford, “Supply chain management and the Internet,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 301–305, 2004, doi: 10.1108/14684520410553796. [link]

D. Waters, Supply Chain Management: An Introduction to Logistics, 2nd ed. New York: Red Globe Press, 2009.

Y. Wang and S. Pettit, “E-Logistics: Managing Your Digital Supply Chains for Competitive Advantage,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 52, pp. 179–185, 2016. [link]

Y. Yu, X. Wang, R. Y. Zhong, and G. Q. Huang, “E-commerce Logistics in Supply Chain Management: Practice Perspective,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 52, pp. 179–185, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.002. [link]

L. Fadile, M. El Oumami, and Z. Beidouri, “Logistics outsourcing: A review of basic concepts,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 53–69, 2018.

J. Yang and K. Yu, “The role of an integrated logistics and procurement service offered by a 3PL firm in supply chain,” J. Manag. Anal., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2019, doi: 10.1080/23270012.2019.1568921. [link]

Logisticbid, “Perusahaan Logistik 3PL: Kamadjaja Logistics, Agility, Ceva, DB Schenker, Deliveree, Puninar, Pancaran Group,” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://logisticsbid.com/perusahaan-logistik-3pl-kamadjaja-logistics-agility-ceva-db-schenker-puninar-pancaran-group/.

D. Syarizka, “Order Makin Besar, JD.ID Tambah Kapasitas Gudang Logistik,” 2019. https://teknologi.bisnis.com/read/20190315/266/900289/order-makin-besar-jd.id-tambah-kapasitas-gudang-logistik.

Tokopedia, “Akselerasi Pemerataan Ekonomi Secara Digital, Tokopedia Luncurkan Layanan Gudang Pintar ‘TokoCabang,’” 2019. https://www.tokopedia.com/blog/press-release-tokopedia-luncurkan-layanan-gudang-pintar-tokocabang/.

J. Zou and L. Shan, “3PL-HUB supply chain logistics cost simulation study based on system dynamics,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 779, pp. 1752–1757, 2013, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.779-780.1752. [link]

R. Rajesh, S. Pugazhendhi, K. Ganesh, C. Muralidharan, and R. Sathiamoorthy, “Influence of 3PL service offerings on client performance in India,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 149–165, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.09.008. [link]

K. Tezuka, “Rationale for utilizing 3PL in supply chain management: A shippers’ economic perspective,” IATSS Res., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.07.001. [link]

A. P. Situmorang, “Menko Darmin Beberkan Penyebab Banyaknya Usaha Ritel Bangkrut,” 2019. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/menko-darmin-beberkan-penyebab-banyaknya-usaha-ritel-bangkrut.html.

J. E. Maddux and R. W. Rogers, “Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 469–479, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9. [link]

D. L. Floyd, S. Prentice-dunn, and R. W. Rogers, “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 407–429, 2000. [link]

T. Sommestad, H. Karlzén, and J. Hallberg, “A meta-Analysis of studies on protection motivation theory and information security behaviour,” Int. J. Inf. Secur. Priv., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 26–46, 2015, doi: 10.4018/IJISP.2015010102. [link]

J. W. Creswell, Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. London: Sage Publishing, 2014.

U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business, 7th ed. West Sussex: Wiley, 2016. [link]

W. Olsen, “Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed,” in Developments in Sociology, M. Holborn, Ed. Ormskirk: Causeway Press, 2004, p. 30. [link]

T. M. Welbourne, “Fear : A Misunderstood Component of Organizational Transformation,” Cent. Adv. Hum. Resour. Stud., vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 1–19, 1994. [link]

A. Gunasekaran, B. K. Rai, and M. Griffin, “Resilience and competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises: An empirical research,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 5489–5509, 2011, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563831. [link]

T. Urakami and X. Wu, “Own brand strategy of the Japanese apparel manufacturers,” Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 114–128, 2017, doi: 10.1108/APJML-12-2015-0189. [link]

H. W. C. Yeung, “Limits to the Growth of Family-Owned Business? The Case of Chinese Transnational Corporations from Hong Kong,” Fam. Bus. Rev., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2000, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00055.x. [link]

Y. Krykavskyy and N. Hayvanovych, “Competitiveness of Family SMEs in the Supply Chain,” J. Intercult. Manag., vol. 11, pp. 81–103, 2019, doi: 10.2478/joim-2019-0004. [link]